These three are international standards developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Each one focuses on a different aspect of management within an organization — quality, environment, and health & safety.
Here’s a clear breakdown:
Purpose:
To help organizations ensure that their products or services consistently meet customer and regulatory requirements and to improve customer satisfaction.
Key focus areas:
Process control and continual improvement
Customer satisfaction and feedback
Leadership commitment and employee involvement
Risk-based thinking and corrective action
Typical use:
Any organization, in any industry, that wants to improve its efficiency and reliability — from manufacturing to services.
Purpose:
To help organizations minimize their environmental impact and comply with environmental laws and regulations.
Key focus areas:
Reducing waste, pollution, and resource use
Managing environmental risks and impacts
Continuous environmental performance improvement
Legal compliance
Typical use:
Companies that want to demonstrate environmental responsibility — for example, factories, construction firms, or energy producers.
Purpose:
To create a safe and healthy workplace by preventing work-related injuries and illnesses.
Key focus areas:
Hazard identification and risk control
Worker participation and consultation
Legal compliance with health and safety laws
Emergency preparedness and continual improvement
Typical use:
Organizations of any size that want to systematically manage workplace safety and protect employee wellbeing.
Many organizations integrate all three into a single Integrated Management System (IMS) because they share similar structures (based on the ISO “High-Level Structure” framework).
That way, one system can handle:
Quality (ISO 9001)
Environment (ISO 14001)
Health & Safety (ISO 45001)
Would you like me to show a simple comparison table of the three (purpose, main benefits, certification focus)? It can make their differences really clear at a glance.